Research guide

Scientific article types and journal selection

Understand original research, review articles and other formats, plan a manuscript and prepare submission. Distinguish journal indexing from article type.

Scientific manuscript writing with a reference book and research notes
Prepared by: Dr. Didgar Research Institute · Last revised: · 3 min read
Expected deliverables
  • Prepare a coherent draft and claim-to-evidence matrix.
Decision workbook and example

Explanation of article types, acceptance criteria, typical structure and submission tips for ISI-indexed and non-ISI journals.

  • Original Research: Papers that present new empirical findings and data.
  • Review Article: Systematic or narrative reviews summarizing existing knowledge.
  • Conference Paper: Shorter reports or preliminary findings presented at conferences.
  • Short Communication / Case Study: Small focused reports or specific case descriptions.

Journal selection and submission readiness

ISI is not an article type. Select the article category from the journal’s author guidelines. Verify scope, data requirements, authorship policy, publication charges and indexing using original sources. Acceptance and review turnaround cannot be guaranteed.

  • Structure the manuscript around study and article type
  • Use appropriate reporting guidance, such as PRISMA or CONSORT
  • Prepare contribution, conflict-of-interest and data statements
  • Respond respectfully and point by point to reviewers

Build an article around one central message

Converting a dissertation into an article is more than shortening chapters. Select a question and central message, retain supporting evidence and adapt the writing to the journal audience. Simultaneous submission or undisclosed duplicate publication may breach publishing policies.

Abstract and discussion

Keep the abstract consistent with actual findings; do not claim more certainty than the evidence supports. Compare relevant studies, consider alternative explanations and describe how limitations affect interpretation. Practical recommendations need evidential support.

Before submission

  • All authors approved the version.
  • Numbers and units match between text and tables.
  • Ethics, funding, conflict and data statements are complete.
  • References, title, abstract and keywords were checked.

Worked case and implementation decisions

The following is a fictional teaching case. Do not use its numbers or wording as actual study findings.

Practice consistent reporting across the abstract, methods and discussion of an observational finding. The abstract should not claim a causal effect when the design estimates association. Specify sample, units, estimator and uncertainty, and never insert fictional values as actual results. Use a question/evidence map to remove repetition and unsupported conclusions. Abstract limits and article structure follow the outlet. Before submission, authors verify numbers, references and disclosures of tool assistance.

Worked case and implementation decisions
StageTeaching exampleVerification question
AbstractAim, design, actual finding and limitConsistent with the paper?
MethodsSample, instruments, analysis and changesAssessable and reproducible?
ResultsEstimate and interval with unitsAre required findings included?
DiscussionAlternatives and scopeWithin the design’s support?
SubmissionRights, references and author approvalAre relevant policies checked?

Exercise output: Prepare a coherent draft and claim-to-evidence matrix.

Sources and further reading

Official sources for verification and further reading

This guide supports research learning and planning; align implementation with the actual design and institutional requirements. Editorial policy
Back to top